Qantas superjumbo Airbus A380's engine damage and the subsequent forced landing are the days news. World leaked information, the machine is damaged worse than first believed, like cluster bombs penetrated the engine parts are made of massive destruction through the machine nhk structure. The descent was a lucky trade and skilled pilots nhk due to the machine, from which fuel is only a part of was able to pump out and 80 tons of extra weight for this reason and Singapore's Changi nhk field (where the author has on several occasions visited) 4 km runway was used in the final meters, only one engine being able to brake right engine nhk had to turn off the fire brigade foam etc. All of course, due to the explosion of the engine and the engine manufacturer is Britain's Rolls Royce. The aircraft manufacturer will only lentorangan, the subscriber number, which engines it wants suitable and as an alternative to the A380 has Trent 900 in addition to the American GE engine. However, the explosion caused by secondary damage, for example. that as many as 11 of the fuel tank (one tail fin) able to pump fuel to other tanks, give the impression of the machine in the design of the "bugs". Somehow, nhk most of the Old European mega projects seem to go regularly wrong, such as the Concorde, which produced only a loss, the Channel Tunnel, nhk as well fell taxpayers peak, Airbus rights nhk struggled with German and French director and the European navigation satellite program nhk Galileo is in deep trouble, only a couple of satellites has so far been obtained in the sky. Pätisikö this old wisdom, "the more the cook, the miserable soup"?
http://yle.fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/2010/11/ilmastomuutos_kylmentaa_talvia_2146570.html You see, when a couple nhk of years ago it warmed, nhk but it is no longer part of this issue. Now therefore get colder in the north. nhk However, seems to be pretty cool also further south in winter as long as this progresses. Reply Remove
It's funny that "forgot" to mention that in that case, the two Qantas Boengin 747 machine has had to return to the airport of departure. Another engine fault (5.11.) And the other due to an electrical fault (15.11). Did you leave without mentioning it because they do not fit your agenda? Reply Remove
It should be added that the Boeng wrestling as much problems with the forthcoming 787 Dreamliner with. The second major construction project, the Hubble successor to the JWST is 3-4 years behind schedule and $ 1.5 billion over the initial 4 billion budget. Strong mutulla guess that brings to enough even though the crisis meetings are held. So, let's not have any issues with rosy across the pond in the back. Reply Remove
Anonymous 1: I looked at the document. HAARP may be something nhk in the idea be, I bet yes even "just" ohjustutkaksi pseudonym. "Chemtrails" yes affect tehdyltä "conspiracy", they're nhk popular, and the US government always targeted. Now the Russians will not do anything dark, or will they, together with us, Haloskahan trots monthly Puttea hugging;-)! Anonymous 3: I "forgot", they are not only the news of the time of writing had not even happened yet, I do not clairvoyant abilities after all, no! B747 jumbos have been in use for much longer than the Airbuses, in fact, the construction is already more than 40 years old, so it is natural, especially when they are many times more traffic, that something hurts. And I remember those jumboissakin was RR engines, I can remember väärinkin. In the second case, the plane crashed nhk into a bird, surely can not keep the machine wrong? And that was only the more serious electrical fault, not the engine exploded, as Airbus! B747 is one of the most reliable type of machinery, the new B777 has been in traffic for more than 10 years completely clean Rekord. Anonymous nhk 4: True, B787: even with the problems, but only koelentovaiheessa, where it does not threaten the passengers, like the A380. The new James Webb Space Telescope is funding because of late, but not nearly as dramatically as Galileo. A certain delay and budget overrun is normal in such mega projects and other French Olkiluoto III;-)! Reply Remove
B747 also suffered teething 40 years ago. Problems were encountered in the testing phase so as after the introduction. There is nothing strange about it. B747 happened in my first four years of operation, two serious accidents in the second (-74), the loss of human lives. Eka full destruction was -78. Reliability can only be seen after many years. But so far, not A380 has been no worse. B787 has a problem as it was with the A380 and almost certainly there will be a small children's diseases, the official introduction of the beyond. What about the A340? How many lives have become? Reply Remove
Looking at wikipedia rote three B747 jumbo havoc: 1. Tenerife, with two jumbo jets collided nhk with the take, the KLM captain fault, not either of the machine. 2. Japan was solved B747:
No comments:
Post a Comment