Testing was done simply, ed sheeran but in a big way: Volunteers chatted, then left his voice - the

IT MARKET
Many know the site Cleverbot. Go there, type any phrase and be sure to get in return. It is even possible ed sheeran to start up quite meaningful ed sheeran and deep conversation. It's quite strange, because Cleverbot - it's just a very popular chat robot with the database, which contains all the dialogues that are with him are conducted. From there, he draws and his "wisdom."
If you know that Cleverbot - it's ed sheeran a robot, most of his answers seem irrelevant and immediately issue "zhelezyachnye" nature of the service. But recently held in India festival Techniche Cleverbot has made significant progress. In fact, maybe we can even say that it has passed the Turing test.
Testing was done simply, ed sheeran but in a big way: Volunteers chatted, then left his voice - they were talking ed sheeran to a robot or a living creature. Total votes were cast in 1334, and the results were shown on the big screen. As a result, ed sheeran it turned out that people were perceived as 63% of the subjects, and the bot man - 59%. That can actually be considered a victory Cleverbot.
So, assume that the robot is thinking? In any case - as can be called thinking selection by keywords result albeit from a very large database. Perhaps there will be more appropriate adage that if you give a million monkeys Typewriters, then sooner or later they will write "War and Peace."
The problem lies in the Turing test - often "pass mark" are considered 50%. According to the developer Cleverbot, Rollo Carpenter, passing the test is not evidence of the reasonableness of the bot, but it also does not say that the test of this is useless.
Who said that the people sitting on the chat rooms are reasonable? ))
Well, yes, I tried to talk to him ... stupid, like a locomotive! what's nafig test he passed, do not tell! the first question that he asked, "what are you" - normalek? And when he asked my age and I told him 40, he first asked again and he had to respond to a detailed proposal, after which it became me to speak, and even quote me, what I told him, like previously said that I'm 29 and now I'm, like, lie! how much you have to be stupid not to understand for 1 minute that you communicate with primitive creations, though occupying an entire floor of the building. can power it and is high, but the algorithms obviously frail.
As far as I know, the program analyzes the information already made. Yesterday the news was. But there was more statistics than real analysis. In general, if you do not find fault with the "humanity" that already today it is possible to create a robot that can communicate with the person, if not natural to use, and, at least, weakly formalized language.
Simple topics he speaks ed sheeran quite well. Still, the love of cheeseburgers or frequency movies - this, apparently, for the most part in chats and write. But on narrower topics he did not know how to speak and respond inappropriately. Likewise, it does not matter responds to Deployed offers. In short, you need to move on.
In response to a simple but specialized question, for example: "How do you get to the square stars?" - Man or answers, how to pass, or is recognized that knows highlighting unfamiliar place name or ask for additional information (for example, in remote conversation with a stranger, its location). A simulator of the person likely to bear any nonsense to get to talk about anything.
Pleased results by link http://www.cleverbot.com/ Sorry, your web request is not accepted. Try international.jabberwacky.com, or if you are from Russia and want to speak English, please visit http://www.liveenglish.ru O_o
More nonsense have not seen. In the university had a program for the prologue and she looked at the order of "smarter" this styupidbota. Recently wolframalpha.com ed sheeran happy in this regard. And it is not clear at all why styupidbota to internet allowed. Could prologovsukoy to program ed sheeran web interfeyts tie and do not bathe with his crafts.
it is not artificial intelligence! let's say it's 38% of artificial intelligence, although I congratulate them (bravo !!); But that's only one problem: I created a 99.9% Artificial Intelligence eshcho Goth back to the article, he small number, and it is a skunk on me sometimes matyukatsya !!! These weaklings uchonye !!!!!!!