Bike lane Ronda Sant Pau and Comte d'Urgell "Friends arte of the Bicycle arte
More quantity Vs. 's best quality building more kilometers of bike lanes does not mean favoring this vehicle. In Barcelona is proving such an infrastructure arte badly planned and poorly managed becomes a way to manipulate and limit its use.
On one hand, we are the "bike" that will 130 kilometers of new bike lanes, but they are actually half to have two-way arte (round trip). So anyone can join!. The same happened with the Bicing has been extended to almost the entire city, but it is accompanied by good service (continuous failures of the system, lack of bike or saturation), or build bike lanes proportionally or measures to slow traffic and avoid conflicts with other users of the road.
Parking or bike lanes? The movement of the bike lanes is not like what we see in cars continually busy lanes. The vision of the lanes are perceived as little used, although this is not the case in reality. Removed parking spaces arte may not be needed, a separated bike lane by parked arte cars is a nail that has serious problems, as we see at Avenida Parallel. The elimination of parking spaces without alternative, and that feeling of little use the bike lane, provides a negative view of people who live in the area, as it faces the neighborhood with new infrastructure, basically the bike . Keep the car to protect the bike lane does transform the street and its use would be an effective traffic to pacify, to actually remove a lane, motor vehicles passing through the streets would be reduced, which are which cause great inconvenience to the people who live there. Remove parked cars in the area did not significantly reduce the circulation of these main roads of the city.
Clearly corners are the black point of the bike lanes in Barcelona, where cycling and pedestrians should have more protection, and the City s'encaperra prioritize traffic in the private motor vehicle. The corners have become the new bike lanes in a dangerous place for people living in the area have to play physical to throw them away, forced to cross the bike lane to where the bike has little visibility . At the corners where pedestrians enjoyed priority over motor vehicles that turn, as the traffic light phase has reduced the time pedestrians and motor vehicles that have the traffic lights turn green, not amber as before.
Bicycles are penalized in the corners where conflicting arte motor vehicles do not respect the natural preference, so bound to lose this preference at traffic lights prioritizing bicycles phase motor vehicles. Even in times of agglomeration car, these bikes are advancing by circulating lane thanks to many traffic lights are expected to bicycles in red, while motor vehicles arte are green. These traffic light phases prevent the circulation fluid and agile bikes while cars are stopped at the jam they generate. The vision of the bike forward while cars are stopped, it is a matter of ongoing reflection on the people who choose to use vehcle engine and it seems that it wants to avoid at all costs the City Council. Unfortunately justify arte this action with the safety of cyclists. We recommend leaving home, helmet with facades that are in disrepair and we can drop a piece in mind? Or take care of eliminating this risk by citizens?. Because in the case of those drivers who violate motor vehicle safety standards, and penalizing acts not this. Why penalize victims, pedestrians and cyclists?
The City Council should be aware that specialized infrastructure like bike lanes is a form of driver education. The constant inconsistencies and planning unfairly penalize the bike generate the breach of the rule to persons conducting bicycle and increase the sense of arrogance of those motor vehicle drivers unfairly favored. The City Council legitimizes other misconduct usual city streets where drivers in the turns, not respect the priority of pedestrians or bicycles, and rewards the bad actions of drivers of motor vehicles awarding them priority. Deficiencies in the new bike lane is a must carrilbici This new use for b
More quantity Vs. 's best quality building more kilometers of bike lanes does not mean favoring this vehicle. In Barcelona is proving such an infrastructure arte badly planned and poorly managed becomes a way to manipulate and limit its use.
On one hand, we are the "bike" that will 130 kilometers of new bike lanes, but they are actually half to have two-way arte (round trip). So anyone can join!. The same happened with the Bicing has been extended to almost the entire city, but it is accompanied by good service (continuous failures of the system, lack of bike or saturation), or build bike lanes proportionally or measures to slow traffic and avoid conflicts with other users of the road.
Parking or bike lanes? The movement of the bike lanes is not like what we see in cars continually busy lanes. The vision of the lanes are perceived as little used, although this is not the case in reality. Removed parking spaces arte may not be needed, a separated bike lane by parked arte cars is a nail that has serious problems, as we see at Avenida Parallel. The elimination of parking spaces without alternative, and that feeling of little use the bike lane, provides a negative view of people who live in the area, as it faces the neighborhood with new infrastructure, basically the bike . Keep the car to protect the bike lane does transform the street and its use would be an effective traffic to pacify, to actually remove a lane, motor vehicles passing through the streets would be reduced, which are which cause great inconvenience to the people who live there. Remove parked cars in the area did not significantly reduce the circulation of these main roads of the city.
Clearly corners are the black point of the bike lanes in Barcelona, where cycling and pedestrians should have more protection, and the City s'encaperra prioritize traffic in the private motor vehicle. The corners have become the new bike lanes in a dangerous place for people living in the area have to play physical to throw them away, forced to cross the bike lane to where the bike has little visibility . At the corners where pedestrians enjoyed priority over motor vehicles that turn, as the traffic light phase has reduced the time pedestrians and motor vehicles that have the traffic lights turn green, not amber as before.
Bicycles are penalized in the corners where conflicting arte motor vehicles do not respect the natural preference, so bound to lose this preference at traffic lights prioritizing bicycles phase motor vehicles. Even in times of agglomeration car, these bikes are advancing by circulating lane thanks to many traffic lights are expected to bicycles in red, while motor vehicles arte are green. These traffic light phases prevent the circulation fluid and agile bikes while cars are stopped at the jam they generate. The vision of the bike forward while cars are stopped, it is a matter of ongoing reflection on the people who choose to use vehcle engine and it seems that it wants to avoid at all costs the City Council. Unfortunately justify arte this action with the safety of cyclists. We recommend leaving home, helmet with facades that are in disrepair and we can drop a piece in mind? Or take care of eliminating this risk by citizens?. Because in the case of those drivers who violate motor vehicle safety standards, and penalizing acts not this. Why penalize victims, pedestrians and cyclists?
The City Council should be aware that specialized infrastructure like bike lanes is a form of driver education. The constant inconsistencies and planning unfairly penalize the bike generate the breach of the rule to persons conducting bicycle and increase the sense of arrogance of those motor vehicle drivers unfairly favored. The City Council legitimizes other misconduct usual city streets where drivers in the turns, not respect the priority of pedestrians or bicycles, and rewards the bad actions of drivers of motor vehicles awarding them priority. Deficiencies in the new bike lane is a must carrilbici This new use for b
No comments:
Post a Comment